My mail has just arrived. In it I have received a letter from Andrew Duff, the leader of the Liberal Democrat MEPs in the EP. He has been supporting our petition and wrote to the Governor on our behalf. Enclosed in his letter is the reply he received from the Secretary General of the BoS, Jose Antonio Alepuz. It reads:
Dear Mr. Duff,
I hereby acknowledge receipt of your letter dated March 5, 2009 urging favourable consideration on petitions submitted to Banco de Espana regarding the alleged failure of Spanish banks to honour bank guarantees (avales bancarios) granted in relation to real estate purchase agreements between construction companies and/or developers as sellers and UK citizens as purchasers. Please allow me to clarify a couple of points:
Firstly, Banco de Espana has no supervisory power over construction companies, builders or developers. Its regulatory powers are limited to banks in order to ensure compliance with a set of rules and prudential regulations dealing with bank solvency and liquidity. Subsequently, it has no authority to enforce the law that regulates payments made to the builders during construction (Law 57/1968). Rules or agreements governing escrow accounts or bank guarantees, and related claims brought by bank customers, are outside the scope of our enabling statute and, therefore, any claim or dispute between the parties – including grantors – arising in connection with the enforcement of real estate purchase agreements, must be filed before the competent Court of Justice.
Secondly, as regards the petitions mentioned in your letter, they have been always re-directed to Banco de Espana’s Complaints Service i.e. The Spanish equivalent of the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service. So far, they have in fact received only three complaints filed by UK citizens in 2008. All of them were dismissed for breach of procedural rules (lack of previous claim before the relevant bank customer’s assistance department). Since the Complaints Service is not part of the Judiciary, its reports are not binding and rather vested with a sort of witness expert evidence effect. In spite of the non-binding effect, Spanish banks tend to proceed voluntarily in accordance with the report in most cases.
I hope that the above clarifies the position of Banco de Espana and the role it can play in this matter.
Yours sincerely
?? [initials]
So, that’s all right then.
The fact that we were petitioning not about individual cases but about the corruption surrounding the processes concerning BGs seems to have completely bypassed them.
Andrew Duff, in his reply to me, says:
‘In light of this response, it is difficult to see where complaints can be addressed with any hope of success.’ And I agree.
MEPs in the committee take the view that persons who “in good faith” have bought property in Spain which has been declared illegal should have the right to appropriate compensation through the Spanish courts. Nevertheless, “developers that have entered into contracts, the unlawfulness of which they should have been aware of, ought not be entitled to compensation”.
once again it looks like a document that was considered a legal safety net is pretty well worthless in reality. Like many contracts, just a farce that leads to long and costly court battles just to get back what is rightly yours anyway. What a complete sham!
Roots: You should be asking Mr Duff, to perhaps focus on the Banks guarantee and not other issue about contracts, constructions etc.
The, BOE representative is right in saying that he does not have the power to get invoved in matters outside his remit. I don’t know what Mr Duff wrote, but it seams that he gave enough lee way for the BOE representative to hijack the subject matter.
On the contrary, Andrew Duff wrote very much to the point of the petition. The BoS have not replied directly to ANY of the issues he raised. Instead they have written their weasel words in an attempt to avoid taking any responsibility for anything.
Looking at this letter from the Secretary General, in my opinion it is just a standard letter sent out to anyone with a complaint. He probably sends out the same letter each month by the hundreds.
I believe the second paragraph starting with: Secondly, as regards the petitions mentioned in your letter…. – the word petitions probably replaced the word complaints just to make it look a bit tailor-made.
All big departments/institutions do it. It’s called the SBL (standard bog letter), which they tinker around with the odd word to make it look personalised.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use the website you agree to our use of cookies. You can find out more here. Accept
Cookies
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.