- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
At our recent AGM a number of people raised an objection concerning the community lifts.
Let me explain. There are only 2 floors on the three separate buildings apart from the penthouse accommodation, of which there are 6 and those portals have lifts ie first floor apartments, no lifts, unless penthouse accommodation is above you. I am in agreement that these lifts benefit only just under a third of residents but we all have to pay but this was the way the cuotas were set and everybody signed their contracts without complaint, presumably like me they were not aware anyway.
I know that the cuotas cannot be changed without unanimous agreement but understand that there will be a vote to cease the operation of the lifts, which I think can be obtained with a 3/5th majority.
Can someone confirm this is the case or not ? I do feel very angry that our neighbours seeked to push the expense on to us in the first place but also feel that, even though only on the 2nd floor, it is unfair to remove this facility from the penthouse owners (I do not own a penthouse by the way) who probably would not have bought without a lift in the first place.
There are grass verges at the back of the ground floor apartments, which I do not utilise, unlike the ground floor apartment owners who use it as an extention of their terrace but would not dream of seeking to concrete over the areas, so that I do not have to contribute to something I don’t use. 😡
-
-
@mariadecastro wrote:
Correct. Art 17.1 LPH.( Horizontal Property Act)
Thank you very much Maria for clarifying that one for me so quickly, much appreiciated.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
