Reply To: Buyers win against Santa Maria Green Hills


@katy wrote:

….was told by the rental manager that it did have an FLO 😮

The developer says the same.
They say they have it through the Administrative Silence Rule………as if that could be applied to a development with a revoked building licence. 🙄

Even one of the ‘bendy’ judges in a past case skimmed over the subject by saying “Ah, I see there is a LFO through AS”. They make it up as they go along to fit in with their (pre-decided) ruling. Like saying the evidence from the Town Hall confirming the b/l was still revoked as being “irrelevant”.

It’s no wonder the good lawyers are having a hard time of it in court.