I’m sorry but I don’t understand your answer.
Surely this resolution has nothing to do with fair trials, public freedoms or human rights and certainly nothing to do with ‘unfairness’.
It is purely a resolution where the Supreme Court sets the interpretation of the law with regards to the illegal inclusion of an expiry date in a Bank Guarantee.
As far as I can see, the only people who have been ‘deprived of his/her legal or human rights’ are those holding Bank Guarantees with an illegal clause.
*Apologies to Spanishlawyer here as I was originally writing Higher Court instead of Supreme Court and caused confusion as a consequence! 😳