Reply To: what if




mg wrote

”You may have been what you considered conned, which has left you with an attitude of always looking to blame and always looking read into something, something that is not there.

………no, mg, not ‘considered’ conned, but liked many others ‘CONNED’, and the the sooner you accept that, the better, otherwise you look very foolish indeed. What rubbish, saying i’m looking to blame, and reading something that is not there. I’m calling a spade a spade. Something you clearly refuse to accept, because you would rather blame the victims than the scum bags we know about. You have made it quite obvious on who’s side you stand.