“Where your two examples are not relevant mg is that neither involved thieving land” – So if it is legal theft, sue for theft.
If it is considered a legal land grab. Tough then.
“from it’s rightful owner” – Obviously both paties consider themselves antitled to the land, hence let the court decide.
“Or in the worst case scenario forcing someone to have their house/home pulled down” _ Much like the chap in UK then who has had his bungalow demolished in the last couple of months (nothing to do with land grap, corrupt developers and lawyers, just law of the land).
” And since when is the process of buying a house supposed to be as risky as buying shares in a volatile market” – When you can’t ruly afford it and get mortgaged over your head.
Would you agree with that?