Plutonium at Desert Springs, Almanzora???

Viewing 22 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #53455
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I’m seriously considering purchasing at Desert Springs, Almanzora however I do have a couple of concerns. The first being the hydrogen bombs that were dropped in that area after to a US airforce collision in 1966. I believe plutonium escaped over an area of 460 acres but I haven’t been able to find out how far from Desert Springs the contaminated land is, all I know is it was near Palomares cememtry. My other concern is that rentals seem to be quite cheap there, off season weeks on a 4 bed luxury villas with pool overlooking golf course (costing approx 850,000 euros) would rent for about 750 euros up to 1800 euros in July and Aug.
      I would be very grateful for any info.

    • #76077
      katy
      Blocked

      The authorities recently extended the contamination area. I read a lot about it last year. The developers issued a statement saying there is nothing to worry about They would though wouldn’t they 😉 Personally I would give it a wide berth. If I find aany links I will post theem.

    • #76079
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Thanks Katy. Thought this might be the one, especially as this development is recommended by Mark Stucklin but there’s always something, isn’t there?

    • #76080
      Anonymous
      Participant
    • #76081
      katy
      Blocked

      Well done Hilly, I did not remember seeing it on here..senility setting in 🙂

    • #76087
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Speaking as a scientist – the smallest spec of plutonium, one that cannot be seen with the naked eye, will kill you if it gets into your lungs. Probably best not to dig the garden! 🙄

    • #76088
      Melosine
      Participant

      Anne.
      Think you will find Desert Springs is in the contaminated area.

    • #76089
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Many thanks to you all. Why on earth did they build there? Shame cos it looks like a good development. We always seem to be unlucky wherever we choose, our first attempt was Nerja but our property was built on rustic land so we got our money back from the builder. Our second attempt was El Soto De Marbella, got our money back again because of the long delays and then atomic bombs!!!! Maybe we’ll have a look around Cornwall.

    • #76090
      Anonymous
      Participant

      😆
      Well done for getting your money back Anne, & twice ❗ ❗
      Hope it will be ‘3rd time lucky’ for you.

    • #76096
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @Anne wrote:

      Maybe we’ll have a look around Cornwall.

      Watch out for Radon Gas down there. 😉

    • #76102
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Anne,

      The reason they have built there is because it is safe to do so, and it’s a lovely spot. If it wasn’t safe, they wouldn’t be there. Radioactive contamination is a great scare story, but it’s also something that can be easily measured by the authorities. There have been many checks over the decades, and Desert Springs have always had a clean bill of health. It’s not an issue to base your decision on. Rental yields are a much more relevant issue.

      Mark

    • #76103
      Anonymous
      Participant

      From Greenpeace website:

      “17 JANUARY 1966: A collision occurred between a U.S. B-52 nuclear bomber and a KC-135 tanker aircraft while over the village of Palomares in southern Spain. The B-52 was on an airborne alert operation and carried four B-28 thermonuclear bombs. In the collision, the KC-135 exploded and caused the B-52 to break up, scattering wreckage over a 100 square mile area. One of the four nuclear bombs landed relatively intact, while the high explosives in two other bombs detonated upon impact with the ground scattering radioactive materials over the village and surrounding area. The fourth bomb fell into the sea and was recovered intact three months later after an extensive underwater search.”

    • #76104
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Don’t forget that Desert Springs comes under Cuevas del Almanzora, and the local PGOU has yet to be approved by the Junta. I would be very surprised, given the position of Desert Springs, if the land was urbanised when the current PGOU was passed (late 1980’s ?).

      A

    • #76105
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Mark, If the contaminated land is not actually in Desert Springs, it is very close and I realise that the area can be monitored by the Spanish Authorities but is it being? If so are these results published? Even if the risk is minimal I’m afraid it’s enough to put me off, not only for my health but also for my investment. There are enough pitfalls involved in buying property in Spain without adding nuclear bombs into the equation. I will be looking at the other developments you recommend though.
      Thanks.

    • #76106
      Melosine
      Participant

      Anne, even though Palomares suffered this tragedy the whole area is being vastly overbuilt with inexpensive holiday complexes, crammed in everywhere, and this is more likely the problem regards cheap rentals.

    • #76107
      katy
      Blocked

      Given its history I would imagine that the developers bought that land very cheap. I would need to have expert independent advice before I bought there, is it worth the bother when there is so much on offer in spain.? We spent a few days golfing there, ok. but nothing special and I must admit if I had known the history I would not have gone, why take the risk!

    • #76118
      Anonymous
      Participant

      The half-life for plutonium is about 24,000 years so wait a bit and buy then. 😀

    • #96876
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I work for the Robert Hitchins Group Ltd Group in the UK, originally involved in housing development in the west of England, where we built 15,000 homes. Background information may be found at http://www.almanzora.com/en/holidays/about/what_we_do.php

      Our subsidiary, The Almanzora Group Ltd, carries out marketing for the Almanzora Bay projects, including Desert Springs, in south east Spain. We are therefore concerned about the content of this thread, of which we had been unaware until recently. Although the last post was some time ago, it seems appropriate to provide some factual information.

      First the contamination issue.

      The 1966 accident is well documented and extensive testing of all areas in and around Palomares has been carried out by the Spanish Government with assistance from the United States of America Department of Energy over the past 44 years. Despite the original clean up, two small areas of affected land have been precisely identified and expropriated by the Government. Both are fenced off and protected; one is adjacent to the cemetery and one is within Palomares village. A third area at the top of some mountains further away is still under investigation. All these areas are at a distance to the south and west of Desert Springs. At the time of the accident, the wind was blowing strongly from the west to the east, so Desert Springs was well up wind of all the affected areas.

      Nevertheless, prior to the start of Desert Springs, the company requested the Spanish Government ministry responsible for contamination protection to test samples from land lying between Desert Springs and the contaminated areas to check that no areas on the plateau where Desert Springs is located were affected. The results were negative, i.e. they showed that there was no contamination present and that the accident had had no affect on Desert Springs nor on its surroundings.

      Second, in respect of the planning issue referred to by “AAA”, the facts are:

      8th May, 1996: Planning Consent for Desert Springs granted by approval of its “Plan Parcial”.
      27th April, 1998: Project of Compensation for Desert Springs approved; dealing with the cession of green zones, school sites, sports areas, etc.
      27th April, 1999: Project of Urbanization approved; dealing with the provision of roads and services.
      10th April, 2000: Construction of Desert Springs commenced, with its infrastructure being carried out in planned phases, infrastructure provision at present about 55% complete.

      All the above was approved in accordance with the Normas Subsidiarias (the Local Plan) for Cuevas del Almanzora, approved by the Junta de Andalucia in 1993, which was and still remains the relevant current and valid governing plan for this area, until the new PGOU.(General Zoning Plan) is approved definitively. The PGOU remains in draft form only in terms of its application to areas outside existing built up areas. Nevertheless, Desert Springs is included in the draft PGOU on the same basis as in the Normas Subsidiarias and will continue to be developed in accordance with its existing planning and other specific consents.

      Being associated with an established and successful long term UK developer of repute, Desert Springs is very aware of client’s concerns regarding the legality of developments in Spain and it encourages the use of reputable independent lawyers for client’s conveyances.

      So all the above facts have been verified many times over in the process of due diligence, carried out on behalf of existing home owners, by a very large number of unrelated and independent solicitors from all over Spain and the UK, as well as other organizations, including Mark Stucklin himself; that is why Desert Springs is included in the very few developments he recommends.

      Finally, as to the over development, this municipality, Cuevas del Almanzora, has very little development, unlike Vera and Murcia. The vast majority of its land area is specifically protected “sierra”, habitats, other special environmental areas and protected agricultural “vega”. Of its coastline, approximately 60% is also protected.

    • #97019
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I work for the Robert Hitchins Group Ltd Group in the UK, originally involved in housing development in the west of England, where we built 15,000 homes. Background information may be found at http://www.almanzora.com/en/holidays/about/what_we_do.php

      Our subsidiary, The Almanzora Group Ltd, carries out marketing for the Almanzora Bay projects, including Desert Springs, in south east Spain. We are therefore concerned about the content of this thread, of which we had been unaware until recently. Although the last post was some time ago, it seems appropriate to provide some factual information.

      First the contamination issue.

      The 1966 accident is well documented and extensive testing of all areas in and around Palomares has been carried out by the Spanish Government with assistance from the United States of America Department of Energy over the past 44 years. Despite the original clean up, two small areas of affected land have been precisely identified and expropriated by the Government. Both are fenced off and protected; one is adjacent to the cemetery and one is within Palomares village. A third area at the top of some mountains further away is still under investigation. All these areas are at a distance to the south and west of Desert Springs. At the time of the accident, the wind was blowing strongly from the west to the east, so Desert Springs was well up wind of all the affected areas.

      Nevertheless, prior to the start of Desert Springs, the company requested the Spanish Government ministry responsible for contamination protection to test samples from land lying between Desert Springs and the contaminated areas to check that no areas on the plateau where Desert Springs is located were affected. The results were negative, i.e. they showed that there was no contamination present and that the accident had had no affect on Desert Springs nor on its surroundings.

      Second, in respect of the planning issue referred to by “AAA”, the facts are:

      8th May, 1996: Planning Consent for Desert Springs granted by approval of its “Plan Parcial”.
      27th April, 1998: Project of Compensation for Desert Springs approved; dealing with the cession of green zones, school sites, sports areas, etc.
      27th April, 1999: Project of Urbanization approved; dealing with the provision of roads and services.
      10th April, 2000: Construction of Desert Springs commenced, with its infrastructure being carried out in planned phases, infrastructure provision at present about 55% complete.

      All the above was approved in accordance with the Normas Subsidiarias (the Local Plan) for Cuevas del Almanzora, approved by the Junta de Andalucia in 1993, which was and still remains the relevant current and valid governing plan for this area, until the new PGOU.(General Zoning Plan) is approved definitively. The PGOU remains in draft form only in terms of its application to areas outside existing built up areas. Nevertheless, Desert Springs is included in the draft PGOU on the same basis as in the Normas Subsidiarias and will continue to be developed in accordance with its existing planning and other specific consents.

      Being associated with an established and successful long term UK developer of repute, Desert Springs is very aware of client’s concerns regarding the legality of developments in Spain and it encourages the use of reputable independent lawyers for client’s conveyances.

      So all the above facts have been verified many times over in the process of due diligence, carried out on behalf of existing home owners, by a very large number of unrelated and independent solicitors from all over Spain and the UK, as well as other organizations, including Mark Stucklin himself; that is why Desert Springs is included in the very few developments he recommends.

      Finally, as to the over development, this municipality, Cuevas del Almanzora, has very little development, unlike Vera and Murcia. The vast majority of its land area is specifically protected “sierra”, habitats, other special environmental areas and protected agricultural “vega”. Of its coastline, approximately 60% is also protected.

    • #97020
      katy
      Blocked

      Perhaps the poster who has dug up this thread could answer this one too

      https://www.spanishpropertyinsight.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2025

    • #97025
      Anonymous
      Participant

      With all the other problems in the Spanish market :-

      over supply
      illegal builds
      demolition of legal properties
      land grab
      ley de costas
      planning corruption
      poor and slow justice system
      high purchase cost/fees
      etc etc…

      the last thing you would want is to add nuclear contimation to the list!!

      I think a post dismissing any potential problems about nuclear contamination by a vested interest is rather going to fall on deaf ears.

      What’s more disturbing is why anyone would consider developing more properties in such an area. I think the oversupply in the Spanish market is underestimated. Personally I think it’s going to be 15 ~ 20 years before demand is going to be sufficient to mean that new properties need to be built.

    • #97028
      Anonymous
      Participant

      There’s an article in today’s El Mundo about the Palomares situation, entitled ‘La recta final del caso nuclear de Palomares’ broadly agreeing with Mr Hitchins, saying that the contaminated areas have been fenced off and that ‘Ecologistas en Acción’ has asked the Government to complete the decontamination – a cost which they put at around 25 million euros.
      http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2010/02/16/ciencia/1266327667.html
      While we joke locally about things glowing at night, the reality is that there is no ‘panic’ or particular concern locally and no reports that I’ve heard of unusual levels of cancer or radiation sickness.
      I can say that Desert Springs is far away the best looking of all of our local golf-centred urbanisations.

    • #97031
      Anonymous
      Participant

      That’s it then, sensible thing is to give it a wide berth, this issue will run and run with no proper conclusion.

Viewing 22 reply threads
  • The forum ‘Real Estate Topics, News & Discussion​’ is closed to new topics and replies.