Jinsa Index – January

LoadingFavourite

This topic contains 9 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Chris McCarthy Chris McCarthy 4 years, 9 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #56524
    Profile photo of Anonymous
    Anonymous
    Participant

    Available here: http://www.tinsa.es/n-pages/np-files/1/down/IMIE/2012/01_FICHA_IMIE_ENERO_2012.pdf

    Year on year:
    General -6.6% (Dec -8.1%)
    Costas -8.1% (Dec -7.2%)

    Peak (Dec 2007) to present:
    General -25.0%
    Costas -33.1%

  • #107919
    Profile photo of Anonymous
    Anonymous
    Participant

    Thanks Brian, as always.

    Is the Jinsa index more reliable than Tinsa’s?

  • #107920
    Profile photo of Anonymous
    Anonymous
    Participant

    Hehe…. not my first typo and no doubt there are many more to come. 😉

  • #107921
    Profile photo of Anonymous
    Anonymous
    Participant

    How is it possible that the index have been lagging so much?

  • #107924
    Profile photo of Anonymous
    Anonymous
    Participant

    The problem Ardun is the general opaqueness of the market. Tinsa is probably the best of the indices out there but it is still, I believe, lagging the real market by 12-24 months.

    The official figures are laughable. I recall a time a while back that they were still reporting price increases even though everybody knew at that stage that the market had been falling for a couple of years.

    One of the main problems is the historical data. Up until a few years ago it was common practice for part of a property transaction to be done under the table to avoid tax. A 200k sale for example would be declared to the authorities as a 150k sale, the remaining 50k would be paid separately.

    My understanding is that this is now mostly a thing of the past however it still greatly distorts current figures. For example, let us say the property that was sold for 200k a few years ago is now sold,and registered as so for 120k. The actual fall in value would be 40% (bought 200k, sold 120k) however the official figures would only show a 20% fall (bought 150k, sold 120k).

    Nobody, whatever they claim, really knows where the market is here.

  • #107927
    Profile photo of Anonymous
    Anonymous
    Participant

    brianc_li that is actually a very logical explanation and i totally forgot about how they did deals back in the days.

  • #107933
    Profile photo of Anonymous
    Anonymous
    Participant

    With taxes on resales going up, for example in Andalucia, expect B-money to make a comeback (and further distort official prices 😕 )

  • #107934
    Profile photo of Inez
    Inez
    Participant

    It never left – creative accounting has come in as well as the usual bags of cash 🙂

  • #107935
    Profile photo of Anonymous
    Anonymous
    Participant

    I must have had very law abiding customers. =)

  • #107965
    Profile photo of Chris McCarthy
    Chris McCarthy
    Participant

    Another distortion often overlooked but perhaps not totally relevant in Tinsa terms on prices is…

    Sales completed volumes in 2006 and 2007 seems to show the market still rising or being active at that time, when nothing could have been further from the truth, what you had however was a huge volume of completions from properties that would have been purchased off-plan in from say 2002 onwards and were completing in 06-07.

    So when you look at sales activity it is often grossly distorted by completion dates having been far beyond initial agreement to purchase.

    Not sure if this helps but it is my contribution anyway!

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.